(Report or the Portfolio Holder for Environmental Sustainability, Waste and Recycling)
Minutes:
The Chair confirmed that apologies had been received from the Portfolio Holder and handed over to the Head of Economic Regeneration , Thomas Hobbs to Introduce the report.
The Officer highlighted the following –
Ø In 2023 Tamworth Borough Council adopted the Staffordshire County Council Electric Vehicle Charging Strategy.
Ø It was requested that the Council commission a borough strategy and the Council appointed Amey who had produced the county strategy to work on this.
Ø The strategy looks at how the Council can support residents with their use of electric vehicles.
Ø The strategy reviews the current situation, it looks at possible future demand within Tamworth and builds on the county work of looking at the need in parts of the community where people can’t easily access their own charging facilities, i.e where no off-street parking.
Ø It sets out some key principles for the borough and give some specific recommendations.
Ø It recognises that this is a fast-changing environment and the risks of moving forward in a way that may not be the best decision in the long term
The Committee made the following comments/observations and asked the following questions:
1. What type of chargers are we considering?
The officer confirmed that the report does not recommend any particular type but suggests where different type of charging may be suitable for different areas. For residents who can charge overnight a slow trickle charge may be sufficient as it is lower cost, however on commercial locations where people may want to charge for half an hour whilst doing their shopping a faster charger may be required.
2. Is there a set amount of chargers we need to have?
The officer confirmed that there is no requirement to have a certain amount, but the report sets out current demand, which is currently not high compared with the rest of Staffordshire.
3. With fast paced changes to technology and other fuels sources such as hydrogen would it be prudent, whilst continuing with the implementation, to review this is two of years?
The officer confirmed that things may change significantly over the next few years and there are plans to increase numbers in a couple of years so this would be a good time to review.
4. What is the difference between chargers and how do we ensure that the ratio of types of charges meets the needs of the area?
The officer confirmed that the difference between charges is the time it takes to charge. There are slow, fast, rapid and ultra rapid which can charge a vehicle in a matter of minutes, depending on the size of the car and battery, and with that comes a difference in cost, therefore ultra rapid charges which are more expensive to charge, and therefore tend to be delivered by commercial companies in high footfall areas.
5. Why is there such a price difference between chargers?
The officer advised that whilst this is not their area of expertise, this may be because the faster chargers are pulling more power off the grid in a shorter time, but that this is not something the Council have control over unless they install their own chargers which can be very expensive. It would be a possibility to do this or work with a partner but that an external provider does bring with them the expertise. It was confirmed the provider at River Drive would be responsible for the design and development, installation, maintenance and repairs and take on the risk.
6. Would we get any income from the external provider?
The Officer confirmed that they would not get an income from the charges, but they would continue to get an income from the parking charges.
7. Concerns were raised around vandalism, and it was suggesting that when choosing chargers to be fitted that consideration be given to this, i.e fitting underground in areas where there is not CCTV
8. Are we working in partnership with other districts/boroughs and where are we looking at bringing chargers first?
Officers confirmed that the first chargers are to be delivered at River Drive and that they are working with other districts to look at rolling out wider numbers under LEVI funding and more information would be put out about these in the future.
9. A recommendation was proposed that a planning consideration be made to ensure consideration is given to access to charging with residential developments.
The Officer confirmed that this would form part of the Local Plan in the future.
Resolved |
that the Committee: |
||
|
|
||
1. |
Endorsed the final version of the Tamworth Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Strategy. |
||
|
|
||
|
(Moved by Councillor C Adams and seconded by Councillor L Clarke) |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
2. |
That the Strategy be reviewed in two years. |
||
|
|
||
|
(Moved by Councillor L Wood and seconded by Councillor L Clarke) |
3. That new developments contain EV charging points
(Moved by Councillor M Couchman and seconded by Councillor C Adams)
Supporting documents: