Agenda item

We feel that given the current absence / situation our local MP is currently in, that we should discuss as a Council the knock-on effects to the Council and the wider town. When Tamworth borough Council seeks funding for larger projects / policies from central pots (for example, LUF, FHSF etc...) that we seek the support and guidance of the locally elected MP. Given the current MP was unavailable over the summer after his misadventures at the Carlton club, followed by resignation from the Whips Office and suspension from the Conservative Party, we feel it is difficult for the Council and other organisations in Tamworth to use him as a conduit to government as previously done.

His actions brought Tamworth into the national media spotlight in a way that hurt us reputationally, at a time when the Council has worked so hard to improve our reputation and image. His absence during the fight for local mental health services was a clear example. We feel the Council needs to debate how in the short term it approaches government as clearly our MP is not able to assist at present.

To consider the following motion, notice of which has been duly given in accordance with Procedure Rule No. 4.12.1 by Councillors M Cook, R Claymore, B Price, P Thurgood, J Wade

We feel that given the current absence / situation our local MP is currently in, that we should discuss as a Council the knock-on effects to the Council and the wider town. When Tamworth borough Council seeks funding for larger projects / policies from central pots (for example, LUF, FHSF etc...) that we seek the support and guidance of the locally elected MP. Given the current MP was unavailable over the summer after his misadventures at the Carlton club, followed by resignation from the Whips Office and suspension from the Conservative Party, we feel it is difficult for the Council and other organisations in Tamworth to use him as a conduit to government as previously done.

His actions brought Tamworth into the national media spotlight in a way that hurt us reputationally, at a time when the Council has worked so hard to improve our reputation and image. His absence during the fight for local mental health services was a clear example. We feel the Council needs to debate how in the short term it approaches government as clearly our MP is not able to assist at present.

(Moved by Councillor M Cook and seconded by Councillor B Price)

Cllr Pritchard under rule 4.14.6 amended the motion with the following – while acknowledging the motion presented to the Council, this Council communicate with the Government as it sees appropriate for each item or issue before it.

(Moved by Councillor R Pritchard and seconded by Councillor A Farrell)

A named vote was requested

This amended motion was carried. 

Councillor B Price put forward Under rule 4.2.28 the following amendment - we support the motion put forward by Councillor Pritchard, but add that Mr Pincher is no longer the trusted conduit with which the Council conducts our communications with the Government

(Moved by Councillor B Price and seconded by Councillor R Claymore)

This amendment was not carried. 

Councillor M Cook Under rule 4.14.12 raised a point of order. At the last meeting State of Borough Debate one Cabinet member decided to swear and tonight when I just made my comments another Cabinet member, Cllr Clements told me to shut up, is that appropriate behaviour in this chamber for members to tell each other to be quiet or words to that effect and in that case  can I please ask for an apology I think it is really important that members can speak freely when going about their business.

Councillor T Clements apologised to Councillor M Cook