116 Quarter Three 2021/22 Performance Report PDF 61 KB
(Report of the
Leader of the Council)
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Report of the Leader of the
Council to provide the Committee with a
performance update and financial health-check. This report was considered by Corporate Scrutiny
Committee on 1st February 2022.
RESOLVED
|
That Cabinet
|
|
approved that the General Fund
budgets are revised to reflect the forecast savings and associated
projected net underspend at Quarter 3 of £895k.
|
|
(Moved by Councillor J Oates and seconded by Councillor R
Pritchard)
|
49 Quarter Three 2021/22 Performance Report PDF 60 KB
(Report of the
Leader of the Council)
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee received the Quarterly
Performance Report Q3 which included a performance update and
financial health-check, and following review by this Committee the
report would be presented to Cabinet on 17th February
2022.
The Committee sought clarifications in the
following areas:
- Under the Corporate Plan Project and
Corporate Risk Register, the Committee noted the potential risk in
terms of impacts on costs on projects (for example, energy costs
impacting on raw material costs)
- Under the Regeneration Projects
update, the Committee noted that there would be a Solway update at
the March 2022 Corporate Scrutiny Committee meeting and welcomed
this. In respect of Future High Street Fund item the
Committee noted the position regarding negotiation for vacant
possession of Middle Entry, and the Committee requested a
confidential update focussed on the progress in respect of the
position on Middle Entry vacant possession and the Co-operative
site. In addition a further update on the marketing of the
Amington Local Centre was requested
including on the general position and timing.
- In terms of the Net Zero Carbon
Project Highlight Report it was noted that Infrastructure Safety
& Growth Scrutiny would lead the scrutiny consideration of
this.
- In terms of the Corporate Capital
Strategy and in particular with regard to the Council’s
investments in Property Funds, a question was raised on what
proportion of the Property Funds were not invested in property (for
example in Government bonds and other financial instruments).
The Vice-Chair also drew members’ attention to the Treasury
Management training on 9th February.
RESOLVED that the report be
accepted.
(Moved by
Councillor Dr S Peaple and seconded by
Councillor A Cooper)
The Assistant Director Finance then left the
meeting.